Check new work against your house style before it ships

Reverse the piece that just came back from a freelancer, diff it against your corpus, and get the specific list of what does not match.

A style guide tells someone what you want. Reversing what they sent and diffing it against work you actually shipped tells you where they missed, specifically enough to fix in one round instead of three.

Why this will not look generic: The comparison runs against work you already shipped and approved, so the notes describe your real standard rather than a reviewer's mood on the day.

What you walk away with

A prompt for the piece under review
A specific list of where it departs from your corpus
Notes you can send back instead of saying it does not feel right

Typical run: 1 to 20 per delivery. Wire the reverse into the handoff so every delivery gets checked on arrival rather than when someone notices.

This one happens in one conversation

You bring: The new piece, and the corpus of your own shipped work it is supposed to match.

Open with: Here is a new piece. Compare it against the prompts in my house style folder and tell me specifically where it departs, ranked by how visible the difference is.

What the thread holds on to:

Your corpus and the new piece at once, so the comparison is against the body of work rather than one example
Which departures you already said you were fine with, so it stops raising them
The running set of notes, ready to send as one message

Then you can just ask:

Which of these would a customer actually notice?
Is the piece wrong, or has our house style drifted and this is the new normal?
Write this as feedback I can send without it reading as a telling off

What the reverse actually gives you

Point it at: A delivered asset, held up against sixty pieces you have already shipped.

What comes back (representative example): The new piece is close and misses on three specifics. Your corpus lights from camera-left in almost every case; this one lights from the right, which inverts every shadow in the frame. Your accent colour appears once per composition and only on interactive or focal elements; here it appears four times including on decorative rules. Your work holds between five and twenty degrees of rotation on the subject, never square-on; this is square-on. Palette, type and crop are all within tolerance, which is why it reads as nearly right and is hard to articulate.

Things you would never have thought to type:

light from the right, inverting every shadow against your corpus
the accent used four times where your work uses it once
square-on, where your catalogue never is
palette and type within tolerance, which is why it is hard to name

What you change: Nothing of your own. The output is three specific notes, which is what turns 'it feels off' into a revision the other person can actually action.

How it works

Reverse the delivered piece - One reverse. You are turning the asset into something comparable with the rest of your corpus.
Diff it against your corpus (In Claude) - Ask for the departures ranked by visibility, not an exhaustive list. Most differences do not matter.

Cost and time

This workflow runs at 1 reverse + about 1 minute. Your result carries automatically from each step into the next, so there is no re-uploading between tools. Reverses are billed from your reverse meter and generation steps from your AI Credits, both bundled in every pay-as-you-go credit pack.

Browse all guided workflows or all individual tools. Pay as you go, no subscription, AI Credits never expire.